The U.S. government’s<-bsp-bb-link state="{"bbDocId":"QIII8ZDWRGG0","_id":"00000175-4bb6-da3c-a177-cbfea9360000","_type":"0000016b-944a-dc2b-ab6b-d57ba1cc0000"}">antitrust case-bsp-bb-link> against Google follows a similar path to its attack on
The suit focuses on payments Google makes to <-bsp-bb-link state="{"bbDocId":"QIF9SSDWRGG7","_id":"00000175-4bb6-da3c-a177-cbfea9370001","_type":"0000016b-944a-dc2b-ab6b-d57ba1cc0000"}">ensure its search engine is the default-bsp-bb-link> on mobile phones and web browsers. Google’s dominant market share and massive revenue allows it to spend billions of dollars a year on these deals, blocking out competitors from the valuable placements and limiting consumer choice, the Justice Department alleged.
It’s a similar argument the government made against Microsoft when it alleged in 1998 ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.