Oracle Corp. didn’t have the U.S. government on its side Monday when it asked the Supreme Court to take an expansive view of cost shifting in copyright cases.
It did, however, claim the support of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Kirkland partner Paul Clement tells the Supreme Court the feds are trying to have it both ways when interpreting "full costs" provision in Copyright Act.
January 15, 2019 at 02:31 PM
1 minute read
Oracle Corp. didn’t have the U.S. government on its side Monday when it asked the Supreme Court to take an expansive view of cost shifting in copyright cases.
It did, however, claim the support of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS