Human rights firm, Bindmans, has hinted that it will pursue judicial review action over the government’s limit on outdoor exercise, saying it disproportionately affects families with disabilities.
The firm is representing two families with children on the autistic spectrum disorder. One child is deliberately taken to a quiet location not local to avoid the limit the risk of infection. Bindmans says the policy makes it difficult for families to be able to manage their children’s high needs and promote their wellbeing during a time when many disabled people are struggling with reduced support from external agencies.
Under the Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) Regulations 2020 people can leave their home for only specified reasons, including exercise. Guidelines in England suggest this should be taken only once a day; in Wales once a day is the law. Bindmans has asked the government to reconsider its policy and says it has sent a letter pursuant to the pre-action protocol for judicial review. The firm says the policy breaches the Human Rights Act and Equality Act.
The firm is representing two families with children on the autistic spectrum disorder. One child is deliberately taken to a quiet location not local to avoid the limit the risk of infection. Bindmans says the policy makes it difficult for families to be able to manage their children’s high needs and promote their wellbeing during a time when many disabled people are struggling with reduced support from external agencies.
Jamie Potter, joint head of the public law and human rights team at Bindmans, acknowledged the importance of the social distancing measures, ‘but they cannot be used to disproportionately interfere in the rights of those with protected characteristics, particularly those with mental illness, autism or similar conditions that necessitate leaving the house more than once per day’.
