How Appealing



Tuesday, December 1, 2020

“Thomas Reavley, federal judge who crossed paths with 6 presidents, dies at 99 in Houston”: Gabrielle Banks of The Houston Chronicle has written this obituary.

Posted at 10:08 PM by Howard Bashman



“Judge signs off on settlement in Michigan transgender bias case”: Melissa Nann Burke of The Detroit News has an article that begins, “A federal judge has signed off on a settlement between the estate of Aimee Stephens and the Metro Detroit funeral home that fired her in 2013 after she came out to her boss as transgender.”

And Paige Smith of Bloomberg Law reports that “EEOC Settles Transgender Bias Case That Went to High Court.”

Posted at 8:13 PM by Howard Bashman



“U.S. judiciary, shaped by Trump, thwarts his election challenges”: Jan Wolfe of Reuters has a report that begins, “U.S. President Donald Trump’s reshaping of the federal judiciary has done little to help him win lawsuits challenging the election outcome, with Trump appointees rebuffing him and the U.S. Supreme Court showing little interest in getting involved.”

Posted at 8:00 PM by Howard Bashman



“Supreme Court Seems Ready to Limit Human Rights Suits Against Corporations; Six citizens of Mali sued Nestlé USA and Cargill, saying the firms had profited from child slavery on Ivory Coast cocoa farms”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report.

Peter Whoriskey of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court weighs child-slavery case against Nestlé USA, Cargill; Despite years of promises by the chocolate industry, child labor remains widespread on cocoa farms.”

Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal reports that “Supreme Court Voices Doubts Over Suit Alleging Nestle, Cargill Liable for Child Slavery; Ivory Coast plantations supply food makers with cocoa.”

Jessica Gresko of The Associated Press reports that “Nestle, Cargill at high court in child labor case.”

Lawrence Hurley of Reuters reports that “U.S. Supreme Court justices question human rights claims against Nestle and Cargill.”

Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News reports that “Supreme Court Signals Narrow Win for Nestle on Human-Rights Suits.”

And in commentary, online at Slate, Mark Joseph Stern has a jurisprudence essay titled “Prominent Anti-Trump Attorney Asks the Supreme Court to Let Companies off the Hook for Child Slavery; Neal Katyal’s legal theory on behalf of Nestle and Cargill might be too extreme even for this ultraconservative court.”

You can access via this link the audio and transcript of today’s U.S. Supreme Court oral argument in Nestlé USA, Inc. v. Doe, No. 19-416.

Posted at 7:56 PM by Howard Bashman



“The Supreme Court Was Right to Block Cuomo’s Religious Restrictions; The balance between Covid-19 precautions and civil liberties doesn’t need to be a partisan issue”: Law professors Michael W. McConnell and Max Raskin have this essay online at The New York Times.

Posted at 7:25 PM by Howard Bashman



“Trump allies to ask Supreme Court to block Pennsylvania ruling on mail-in ballots”: Robert Barnes and Elise Viebeck of The Washington Post have an article that begins, “President Trump’s allies said Tuesday they have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to block a decision by Pennsylvania’s highest court dismissing a challenge of the state’s mail-in voting system.”

Via Democracy Docket, you can access the petitioners’ “Emergency Application for Writ of Injunction Pending the Filing and Disposition of a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari.”

Posted at 4:00 PM by Howard Bashman



“At the White House, Capitol and Supreme Court, Trump goes on a spree of sabotage”: Columnist Dana Milbank has this op-ed in today’s edition of The Washington Post.

Posted at 1:59 PM by Howard Bashman



“Supreme Court Weighs Breadth of Computer Hacking Law; Officer allegedly used law-enforcement database for personal purposes in a case that has drawn widespread attention”: Brent Kendall of The Wall Street Journal has this report.

Andrea Vittorio of Bloomberg Law reports that “U.S. Supreme Court Weighs Proper Access Under Anti-Hacking Law.”

Eric Geller of Politico reports that “Justices express qualms about sweeping computer crime law; The government’s interpretation of a 1986 law that has been used to prosecute hackers and internet activists risks ‘making a federal criminal of us all,’ Justice Neil Gorsuch said.”

Alfred Ng of c|net reports that “Supreme Court hears case on hacking law and its limits; The ‘dangerously vague’ Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, established in 1986, gets a look 34 years later.”

And Jack Rodgers of Courthouse News Service reports that “Computer Crime Law Scrutinized at Supreme Court.”

You can access via this link the audio and transcript of yesterday’s U.S. Supreme Court oral argument in Van Buren v. United States, No. 19-783.

Posted at 1:23 PM by Howard Bashman



“Thank You, Justice Gorsuch: Liberals will one day cite and celebrate this defense of religious liberty.” Columnist Bret Stephens has this op-ed in today’s edition of The New York Times.

Posted at 11:28 AM by Howard Bashman



“Fifth Circuit to Decide Whether Southern Baptist Minister Can Sue Southern Baptist Ministry over Religious Dispute”: Christopher Mills and Daniel Blomberg had this post at National Review’s “Bench Memos” blog back in August 2020 about a petition for rehearing en banc filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Yesterday, the Fifth Circuit posted online its order dated November 25, 2020 denying rehearing en banc by a vote of 8 in favor to 9 against. Judges James C. Ho and Andrew S. Oldham issued dissents from the denial of rehearing en banc.

Posted at 9:36 AM by Howard Bashman